DOI : https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v10i2.1002

Evaluation of Constructability Factors on The Implementation Budget Plan Based on Importance Performance Analysis

Shalwa Norendina Aziz (1), I Nyoman Dita Pahang Putra (2), Elok Dewi Widowati (3), Griselda Junianda Velantika (4)
(1) Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
(2) Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
(3) Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
(4) Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download
How to cite (AJARCDE) :
Shalwa Norendina Aziz, Putra, I. N. D. P., Elok Dewi Widowati, & Griselda Junianda Velantika. (2026). Evaluation of Constructability Factors on The Implementation Budget Plan Based on Importance Performance Analysis. AJARCDE (Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment), 10(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v10i2.1002
Citation Format :

The rapid growth of the construction industry has increased the complexity of project implementation; however, in practice, cost overruns still frequently occur due to the suboptimal application of constructability during the planning and execution phases of projects. This situation results in a discrepancy between the planned budget and actual on-site expenditures. This study aims to identify the constructability factors that influence the implementation of the budget plan, analyze. The importance and performance levels of each factor, and evaluate the gaps as a basis for determining improvement priorities. The study employs a quantitative approach using a survey method by distributing questionnaires to contractors, followed by analysis using the Importance-Performance Analysis method. The results indicate that the average importance level of 3.737 is higher than the performance level of 3.368, suggesting that the implementation of constructability factors has not fully met the expected level of importance. A total of 16 variables had a conformity level below 100%, thus falling into the improvement priority category, while several other variables demonstrated performance that met or exceeded their importance levels. The contribution of this study lies in the integration of constructability analysis with the evaluation of the efficiency of the implementation budget plan using the IPA method to determine priorities for improving the performance of constructability factors


Contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs):
SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
SDG 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

[1] F. F. Remi, “Kajian Faktor Penyebab Cost Overrun Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung,” J. Tek. Mesin, vol. 06, no. 2, pp. 94–101, 2017, doi: 10.22441/jtm.v6i2.1187.

[2] Fatchurrohman, M. Zaki, D. Pontan, and E. Kurniyaningrum, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Cost Overrun Pada Proyek Preservasi Jalan,” Rang Tek. J., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 367–372, 2024, doi: 10.31869/rtj.v7i2.5476.

[3] G. A. Pambudi and F. H. Suprahman, “Systematic Literature Riview: Peranan Metode BIM dalam Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) untuk Mengoptimalkan Konstruktabilitas Proyek,” J. Teor. dan Terap. Bid. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 2025, doi: 10.5614/jts.2025.32.1.10.

[4] D. Pitaloka and I. Rivai, “Perbandingan Antara Rab Dan Rap Pada Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah (Rsud) Kota Depok,” J. Tek. Sipil - Arsit., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.54564/jtsa.v19i1.28.

[5] F. A. Suryawinata, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Cost Overruns Proyek Konstruksi Gedung?: Kajian Literatur Sistematis,” J. Sustain. Constr., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2024, doi: 10.26593/josc.v4i1.8157.

[6] P. M. Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 5th ed., vol. 5, no. 3. Project Management Institute, 2013.

[7] Zahrina, B. A, and I. P. bin Amiruddin, Analisa Rencana Anggaran Biaya (RAB) Dan Rencana Anggaran Pelaksanaan (RAP) Pada Proyek Peningkatan Jalan Samalanga Kabupaten Bireuen, vol. 08, no. 02. Buketrata: Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://e-jurnal.pnl.ac.id/JSST/article/view/8419

[8] N. K. Muliyanti, I. W. Suasira, and N. S. E. Y. Kadek, “Analisis Rencana Anggaran Pelaksanaan (RAP) Pekerjaan Struktur Proyek Edenfild Villa,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 728–735, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ojs2.pnb.ac.id/index.php/senasketekniksipilan/article/view/2384

[9] L. H. Ha and P. N. Van Phuong, “The Assesment Of Building Design Considering Constructability Factors,” J. Sci. Technol. Civ. Eng., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 61–69, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://stce.huce.edu.vn/index.php/en/article/view/937

[10] H. Sulistio and Magawaty, “Peran Kontraktor dalam Peningkatan Constructability pada Pembangunan Jalan Jembatan Wilayah Kalimantan Timur Pendahuluan,” J. Ilmu dan Terap. Bid. Tek. Sipil, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 27–39, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undip.ac.id

[11] O. A. Ahmed and M. A. R. Mahjoob, “The factors That Affect Constructability in Iraq,” Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2024, doi: 10.2478/otmcj-2024-0002.

[12] C. Zhang, T. Zayed, W. Hijazi, and S. Alkass, “Quantitative Assessment of Building Constructability Using BIM and 4D Simulation,” Open J. Civ. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 442–461, 2016, doi: 10.4236/ojce.2016.63037.

[13] A. Faraji, S. H. Arya, E. Ghasemi, H. Soleimani, and P. Rahnamayiezekafat, “A Constructability Assessment Model Based on BIM in Urban,” buildings, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1–22, 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13102599.

[14] E. Yulianti and T. Umbara, “Analisis Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (Studi Kasus?:JNE Jhoni Anwar Kota Padang),” J. TEKNOIF, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 78–86, 2020, doi: 10.21063/jtif.2020.v8.2.78-86.

[15] N. Wisudawati, M. G. Irfani, M. Hastarina, and B. Santoso, “Penggunaan Metode Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Untuk Menganalisis Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Administrasi Kependudukan Kecamatan Lengkiti The Use of Importance-Performance Analysis in Evaluating Public Satisfaction with Population A,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2023, doi: 10.32502/js.v8i1.5969.

[16] A. Gunawan, N. Wahyuni, and A. S. Utami, “Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan Terhadap Pasien Rawat Jalan di Krakatau Medika Hospital,” J. Integr. Syst., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–39, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.ulbi.ac.id

[17] D. Yunianto, J. U. D. Hatmoko, and A. Hidayat, “Evaluasi Penerapan Constructability pada Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung,” MEDIA Komun. Tek. SIPIL, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 135–144, 2014, doi: 10.14710/mkts.v20i2.9255.

[18] F. J. Koswara and H. Sulistio, “Peran Kontraktor Dalam Peningkatan Constructability Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Bertingkat Di Jabodetabek,” J. Mitra Tek. Sipil, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2023, doi: 10.24912/jmts.v6i1.17353.

[19] I. F. Away, H. Wardono, and B. S. Salasa, “Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Pelaksanaan Dengan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Serta Waktu Pelaksanaan Pada Pekerjaan Peningkatan Struktur Jalan Rasau -Sepulau (Studi Kasus?: Jalan Rasau - Sepulau Kalimantan Barat),” J. Ilm. Tek. Sipil, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 9–14, 2022, doi: 10.46964/inersia.v14i2.1032.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.